HAL Medical Blog Award

Within the last 20 years we have seen significant improvements in the treatment of colorectal cancer, yet this indication still represents one of the most prevalent and deadly tumor types with 142,570 new cases and 51,370 deaths each year.  This year at the 2011 ASCO meeting in Chicago, a great historical treatment perspective on the advancements in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer was shared, from the first drug (5-FU) to be approved in 1959, to newer targeted therapies that specifically attack tumor blood vessels that feed cancer cells oxygen and nutrients.  Given advancements in medicine and molecular biology, physicians now have more therapeutic options and genetic tools that can help personalize treatment and lead to better patient outcomes.

Without question, our understanding of the molecular basis of colorectal cancer is improving treatment outcomes and survival rates.  Since the 1960s, colon cancer incidence has decreased by 40% and mortality by 25%.  The median survival for metastatic colorectal cancer once stood at 6 months prior to the introduction of 5-FU into the market and now patients can live longer than 20 months as a result of newer approved therapies.  Newer combination therapies and genetic tests will likely improve survival even more as we learn what underlying genetic changes contribute to the development and progression of this terrible disease.

Genetic and physiological tests that are currently used in colon cancer include the following:

  • Pharmacodynamic biomarkers – tests that can help determine whether a drug is working (example: some drugs cause skin rashes on patients and these rashes can help determine whether the drug is active and not being quickly metabolize by the body).  These tests help determine whether a drug dose must be lowered or elevated
  • Predictive biomarkers – tests that predict the outcome of certain therapies (example: patients harboring normal copies of a gene called KRAS are more likely to benefit from therapies such as Erbitux or Vectibix).  Tests help determine which patients are likely to benefit from a given therapy
  • Prognostic biomarkers – tests associated with outcome independent of therapy (example: tests help determine whether a given patient is at greater risk from dying from the disease compared to those patients testing negative for such a test)

We are halfway through the year and the FDA has already approved a number of novel cancer treatments. Yervoy was the first advanced melanoma therapy to be approved in over 13 years, Zytiga the first oral medication approved for advanced forms of prostate cancer, and Zactima the first oral medication approved for the treatment of a rare form of thyroid cancer. These approvals expand the treatment options for many cancer patients with few previous alternatives. Although this represents significant advancements, it does come at a significant cost. Some of these therapies, for example, can cost over $5,000 a month, requiring many patients to seek financial assistance from manufacturer programs and / or foundations.

Navigating the financial assistance landscape can be difficult. Luckily, there are great resources available that can help every patient pay for therapy. Below are some usefull resources that can be used to help reduce your copays and treatment costs.

The Chronic Disease Fund

The Chronic Disease Fund offers assistance for cancers of the prostate, liver, lung, pancreas, thyroid, colon and breast. You can enroll into their disease funds online and they will work most pharmacies to help reduce a patient’s drug copay throughout the year. They are often the preferred foundation for many specialty pharmacies and oncology practices given their extent of fund availability and fundraising capabilities.

The Healthwell Foundation

The Healthwell Foundation also represents a significant source of funding for cancer patients. Their disease funds include common cancers as well as more rare tumors such as chronic myeloid leukemia, cuteneous T cell lymphoma, and metastatic melanoma. Given their volume of funding requests, their colorectal, breast, brain, and lung cancer funds are currently closed until more donations are provided.

The Patient Advocate Foundation

The Patient Advocate Foundation offers copay relief for many common and rare cancers. They also provide many links to important web resources to help patients with therapy education, clinical trials information and management of symptoms. They also work with many other foundations to help patients find assistance in cases when their disease funds are closed or unavailable.

The Assistance Fund

The Assistance Fund provides copay assistance for more common cancers such as breast, colon and lung. In addition to providing financial assistance for drug copays, they also assist patients with costs associated with their insurance deductibles. Further, they help patients remain on therapy through their extensive compliance and adherence programs.

Cancer Financial Assistance Coalition

CFAC is a database that allows one to find regional and / or national assistance for most forms of cancer at the zip code level. You can search for medical expense, transportation, or even housing / lodging assistance.

  • Comments Off

More than a decade has passed since a groundbreaking article, The Hallmarks of Cancer, was published in Cell by Douglas Hanahan and Robert A.Weinberg that in many ways crystallized the scientific community’s “roadmap” for studying and treating cancer.  Now, the authors have revisited this framework in a recent article published in Cell, The Hallmarks of Cancer: the Next Generation, adding additional areas of focus underlying the tumor-host relationship, which promises to fuel additional work in the fight against cancer.

Much has happened since the original publication, in which the authors proposed six hallmarks of cancer development as a framework for how the complex multi-step process towards disease fits together. Unsurprisingly, research and treatment has focused during these years on targeted therapies, which specifically take aim at the “hallmark mechanisms” described by Hanahan and Weinberg.

The original six hallmarks of cancer development and examples of how treatments have been developed with these targets in mind include the following:

  1. Sustaining proliferative signaling: Therapies include EGFR inhibitors
  2. Evading growth suppressors: Therapies in development include cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors
  3. Activating invasion and metastasis: Therapies in development include inhibitors of HGF/c-Met
  4. Enabling replicative immortality: Therapies in development include telomerase inhibitors
  5. Inducing angiogenesis: Therapies include inhibitors of VEGF signaling
  6. Resisting cell death: Therapies in development include proapototic BH3 mimetics

When in March of this year the authors published an update to their framework of cancer biology in Cell, they introduced four additional hallmarks of cancer development:

  1. Avoiding immune destruction
  2. Tumor-promoting inflammation
  3. Genome instability and mutation
  4. Deregulating cellular energetics

Already, the therapeutic implications of these additional hallmarks of cancer development are being targeted by researchers.

Therapies in development targeting cancer cells’ ability to avoid immune destruction include the area of immune activating anti-CTLA4 mAb agents. Many selective anti-inflammatory drugs are available and being developed to target tumor-promoting inflammation.  PARP inhibitors target genome instability and associated mutations. Finally, aerobic glycolysis inhibitors target deregulating cellular energetics.

The “road” from theoretical thinking to practical medical strategy to a well-funded study to an actual cancer therapeutic is travelled by many visionary researchers across the globe, one lab building on the finding of the other. Collectively, they inch towards the goal in the fight against cancer.

The significant value of Hanahan and Weinberg’s work is not in the development of safe, effective therapies themselves, but in the structure they provide to a highly competitive community of research scientists at countless institutions. Adding structure to this complex area of clinical research, without which, the scientific community would be less focused on the high impact anti-cancer targets, paves the way for thousands of studies in the areas that matter most, based on the underlying science.

It is the structure in thinking, and focus provided that is the key to progress. And with great optimism, we see a new, more comprehensive “roadmap” directing the world towards the next generation of anti-cancer therapies.

Our Mission:

By empowering patients facing challenging healthcare decisions, we strive to improve patient quality of care and quality of life through knowledge-sharing and innovative applications.

Condition-Related Support Communities

Want to Follow us on Facebook? Please click on the “Like” button below